<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The Liberator: The First 3D-Printed Pistol]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Spent some time this week going down the rabbit hole on the Liberator — the plastic .380 that Cody Wilson printed in 2013 and somehow turned into a decade of federal litigation. Whether you think Wilson was a hero, a lunatic, or just a guy who was really good at poking bureaucracies with a stick, the legal fallout is worth understanding. It touched First Amendment territory that most gun owners don't think about until it matters.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The Liberator was less a weapon than a provocation -- a physical argument that the internet had made firearms regulation structurally impossible.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">That framing is honest, and it's why the government panicked the way it did. A single-shot plastic pistol that Swiss researchers said was more dangerous to its shooter than its target isn't a threat to anyone at a range. The threat was the file sitting on a server.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">We were informed that we would have lost this case in court, or would have likely lost this case in court, based on First Amendment grounds.<br />
— State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">That quote from the State Department is the part that doesn't get enough attention. They settled, paid $40,000, and handed Defense Distributed a publishing license — not because the gun was good, but because CAD files are speech and they knew a court was going to say so eventually. Alan Gura — the same attorney who argued Heller — was on this case for a reason.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Federal law at the time did not require serial numbers or registration for firearms manufactured at home for personal use, making the Ghost Gunner a legal path to an untraceable, functional firearm that didn't depend on 3D printing at all.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This is where the story gets practical. The Liberator was a proof of concept that fired once under controlled conditions. The Ghost Gunner was a product that churned out functional 80% AR lowers — and Wilson was selling them at the LGS counter level, basically. The plastic pistol was the headline; the CNC mill was the business.</p>
<p dir="auto">The whole arc — from a printed .380 to a multi-state legal battle over whether design files are protected expression — is a case study in how technology moves faster than law, and how a single test fire in Texas ended up in front of 20 state attorneys general.</p>
<p dir="auto">For those of you who've built 80% lowers or done any home gunsmithing: at what point did you first actually think about the legal status of what you were building, and did the Ghost Gunner or the Liberator coverage change how you thought about it?</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://boisegunclub.com/handbook/liberator-3d-printed-pistol" rel="nofollow ugc">Read the full article in The Handbook →</a></strong> | By The Boise Gun Club Team</p>
]]></description><link>https://boisegunclub.com/forums//topic/398/the-liberator-the-first-3d-printed-pistol</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 10:36:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://boisegunclub.com/forums//topic/398.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 23:03:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>