<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[.45 ACP Cartridge]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Spent more than a few range days putting .45 ACP through its paces — and a fair amount of time at the reloading bench working with 230-grain FMJ. So when something catches my eye in a write-up on this old cartridge, it's worth talking through.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The Army's short-term fix was to pull old .45 Colt Single Action Army revolvers out of storage — some dating back to the Indian Wars campaigns — and reissue them. The heavier bullet performed noticeably better.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Think about that for a second — the Army's answer to a modern counterinsurgency problem was to dig out guns that were already antiques. That the heavier .45 Colt actually worked where the .38 Long Colt didn't is a data point that caliber partisans have been arguing about ever since, and honestly, it's not the worst argument to make.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">A handgun cartridge intended for military use should have a caliber no smaller than .45, with soldiers drilled unremittingly in the accuracy of fire.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">People quote the first half of that constantly and ignore the second half — the part about unremitting accuracy training. The Thompson-LaGarde board wasn't handing out a pass to guys who miss. That caveat matters whether you're on a match stage or carrying concealed.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The <strong>.45 ACP</strong> runs at roughly 40–60% of the chamber pressure that comparable modern cartridges generate. That low bolt thrust extends the service life of firearms chambered for it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Anyone who's shot an old-school 1911 that's been through serious round counts knows this is real. Low-pressure cartridges are gentler on everything — frame, barrel, extractor. It's one reason suppressor hosts chambered in .45 ACP tend to hold up well over time, and why the platform has a reputation for longevity when it's properly maintained.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Since <strong>.45 ACP</strong> rounds are <strong>subsonic</strong> from the muzzle, there's no supersonic crack to deal with — only the muzzle report, which the <strong>suppressor</strong> addresses.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This is the thing 9mm guys don't always think about when they're bragging about suppressor performance — they're fighting a ballistic physics problem on top of the gas problem. With .45 ACP you're not. Every round is already subsonic without subsonics. The tradeoff on bore diameter and wet-firing requirements is real, but the baseline is hard to argue with.</p>
<p dir="auto">What's your experience been with .45 ACP suppressors specifically — wet versus dry, and did the caliber choice actually matter for your hearing protection numbers compared to a 9mm setup?</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://boisegunclub.com/handbook/45-acp-cartridge" rel="nofollow ugc">Read the full article in The Handbook →</a></strong> | By The Boise Gun Club Team</p>
]]></description><link>https://boisegunclub.com/forums//topic/405/.45-acp-cartridge</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 09:37:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://boisegunclub.com/forums//topic/405.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 23:03:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>