According to the Forbes account, when Glock offered to build a pistol for the Austrian military, they laughed at him.

No external safety to manage, 34 parts instead of 60, and built by a man who made curtain rods. The guys who laughed were probably running companies with a century of institutional knowledge — and they still lost the contract.

Glock test-fired the prototype using his left hand — so that if the gun blew up, he could still draw a blueprint with his right.

That's the kind of detail that sticks with you. He knew the risk, accounted for it practically, and kept going. If you've ever watched someone dump a squib load at the range and freeze up, you understand the difference between someone who manages risk and someone who just avoids it.

Glock's characterization of Smith & Wesson's Sigma patent infringement was blunt: 'I felt like my wallet was stolen.'

Put a Sigma and a G17 side by side sometime. The Sigma lawsuit was settled quietly, but the Sigma never really recovered in the market — sometimes the copy doesn't carry the reputation the original earned.

The manufacturing cost figure is the one that doesn't get enough attention. A $75 production cost on a $500 retail gun gave Glock pricing leverage that legacy manufacturers couldn't touch without gutting their own margins — that's how you convert two-thirds of American law enforcement in under a decade.

What was the first Glock you ever ran, and did it change how you thought about what a carry gun needed to be?

Read the full article in The Handbook → | By The Boise Gun Club Team