<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Fire Lance: The Gunpowder Weapon That Started Everything]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Long articles about early firearms history can go sideways fast — either into dry academic recitation or breathless "this changed everything" hype. This one mostly stays grounded, and there are a few details in here worth chewing on.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Once the fire goes off it completely spews the rear pellet wad forth, and the sound is like a bomb that can be heard for five hundred or more paces. — History of Song, 1259</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">That's the moment. A projectile that occludes the bore, gas pressure builds, projectile exits with authority — that's not a flamethrower anymore, that's a gun. Everything from your carry piece to a 1,000-yard precision rifle traces back to someone in 1259 figuring out you needed to seal the bore. Every time you're troubleshooting a squib or thinking about headspace, you're dealing with the same physics these guys stumbled into.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Mongol soldiers feared the fire lance specifically, even while holding other Jin weapons in lower regard</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">That detail sticks with me. The Mongols were rolling over everything in front of them — cavalry, fortifications, combined armies — and they had a specific fear response to fire lances. A weapon doesn't have to be accurate or reliable to be psychologically effective. Anyone who's been around a .44 Magnum at an indoor range knows that sound and concussion do work on their own.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">In 1257, Song official Li Zengbo was dispatched to inspect frontier arsenals and found conditions alarming... "no more than 85 iron bomb-shells, large and small, 95 fire-arrows, and 105 fire-lances" — which he described as woefully inadequate for even a hundred men to defend against a serious attack.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Some things don't change. A garrison inspector in 13th-century China writing up a "we're critically understocked" report reads exactly like every armorer's inventory complaint since. The weapons evolved, the logistics complaints stayed identical.</p>
<p dir="auto">What's the oldest firearm — or type of firearm — you've personally handled, and did the age of the thing change how you thought about shooting it?</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://boisegunclub.com/handbook/fire-lance-history" rel="nofollow ugc">Read the full article in The Handbook →</a></strong> | By The Boise Gun Club Team</p>
]]></description><link>https://boisegunclub.com/forums//topic/437/fire-lance-the-gunpowder-weapon-that-started-everything</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 08:40:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://boisegunclub.com/forums//topic/437.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 23:03:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>