<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[North Carolina Firearms History]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Kings Mountain doesn't get nearly enough attention for what it actually was — not a set-piece battle between organized armies, but a rifle fight won by men who hunted for a living and brought their personal firearms to settle a personal threat.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Kings Mountain was decided by riflemen using personally owned weapons, fighting without Continental Army support, because they understood those rifles from years of daily use.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">That's not a small point. Ferguson had military training, a defensive position, and 1,100 men. The Overmountain Men had long rifles they'd been shooting since they could carry them and the motivation that comes from someone threatening your home. Sixty-five minutes later, Ferguson was dead and Cornwallis abandoned his invasion. The equipment mattered — Pennsylvania-style rifles reaching out past smoothbore musket range — but the real edge was proficiency built over years, not issued at muster.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The Regulators tried legal channels first: petitions, lawsuits, elections. When those failed, they got disruptive.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The Alamance Creek situation is genuinely worth understanding if you think about where firearms fit into civic life. The Regulators weren't radicals — they were farmers getting shaken down by corrupt officials who tried every legitimate option first. Then Tryon showed up with cannons. And here's the kicker: Robert Howe, who commanded that artillery against fellow colonists at Alamance, went on to become a Continental major general. You can see why some Piedmont settlers weren't in a rush to pick up their rifles for those same men four years later.</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">The eastern plantation economy increasingly viewed armed Black residents, both enslaved and free, as a threat to social order, and that fear drove some of the earliest state-level firearms restrictions.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">This is the thread that runs straight into North Carolina's pistol purchase permit system — a Jim Crow-era mechanism that survived well into the 21st century. The article says that chapter closed in 2023, which it did when the legislature repealed the permit requirement over the governor's veto. When you understand where those laws actually came from, the repeal argument looks a lot different than the surface-level debate you'd hear at a gun store counter.</p>
<p dir="auto">For those of you who've spent time in North Carolina — either shooting there, carrying there, or dealing with their old purchase permit system — how did you experience that regulatory framework in practice, and did you know the history behind it when you were dealing with it?</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong><a href="https://boisegunclub.com/handbook/north-carolina-firearms-history" rel="nofollow ugc">Read the full article in The Handbook →</a></strong> | By The Boise Gun Club Team</p>
]]></description><link>https://boisegunclub.com/forums//topic/533/north-carolina-firearms-history</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:59:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://boisegunclub.com/forums//topic/533.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 23:04:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>