Supreme Court to Hear Hawaii Concealed Carry Case This Month
-
Supreme Court to Hear Hawaii Concealed Carry Case This Month
This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult with a qualified attorney for legal guidance.
Why it matters: This case could determine whether your concealed carry permit actually means something when you step into a grocery store or restaurant. Right now in Hawaii, having that plastic card in your wallet doesn't guarantee you can carry anywhere—you need to ask permission like you're in elementary school.
The Supreme Court returns from winter break next week with a January docket that includes Wolford v. Lopez on January 20. This Hawaii case has the potential to reshape concealed carry rights nationwide.
The legal reality: Hawaii's law goes way beyond normal concealed carry restrictions. Even with a valid permit, you have to get explicit written permission from every property owner before carrying in places like shopping centers, restaurants, or any privately-owned public space.
Think about that for a second. You've already jumped through all the hoops—background checks, training, fees—and Hawaii still wants you to play Mother May I with every business owner in town. It's like having a driver's license but needing permission to use every parking lot.
Between the lines: This effectively kills concealed carry as a practical right. Most permit holders aren't going to call ahead to ask if they can bring their legally carried firearm to lunch. The law transforms carry from a right you exercise with a valid permit into a privilege that requires case-by-case approval from people who probably don't even know the law themselves.
The current Supreme Court has been solid on gun rights lately, so Hawaii's facing an uphill battle. But watch for whether the conservative justices reference Scalia's language from Heller about "sensitive places" and "longstanding prohibitions."
What this means for you: For the roughly 21 million Americans with concealed carry permits, this decision could determine whether states can create backdoor bans through permission-based systems. If Hawaii wins, expect other anti-gun states to copy this playbook immediately.
The stakes are high because carry laws are all over the map right now. Some states have constitutional carry—no permit needed. Others make you beg for the privilege. A ruling against Hawaii could limit states' ability to pile additional restrictions on top of the permit process they've already put you through.
The bottom line: Hawaii's requirement looks vulnerable given the Court's recent Second Amendment trend, but oral arguments will show us how broadly they're willing to rule. The justices' questions on January 20 will tell us whether they see this as government overreach or acceptable regulation.
Other cases this month include transgender athlete disputes on January 13 and a Federal Reserve case on January 21. But for gun owners, January 20 is the date to watch—it could reshape what your carry permit actually allows you to do in the real world.
Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett
Join the Discussion
If Hawaii's law gets struck down, do you think other states should have to follow suit, or should property owners still have the right to prohibit carry on their land?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login