Permitless Carry: National Bill Introduced

[admin]

Permitless carry bills get introduced pretty regularly — most of them go nowhere and everyone knows it. But Lee and Massie dropping this together, with GOA and NAGR both visibly behind it, is worth paying attention to even if it dies in committee.

"The Founders established a national right to keep and bear arms, not to ask for permission from hostile local officials, or risk imprisonment for crossing the wrong state line."

That last part is the real bite. I've talked to guys at the Boise Gun Club who won't even drive through certain states with a firearm in the car because the permit math gets too complicated too fast. That's not paranoia — that's people doing the math and deciding it's not worth the risk.

The detail about gun-free zones is where this gets interesting in practice. The bill narrows enforceable gun-free zones to places with active screening — courthouses, jails. That's a meaningful line to draw. It's the difference between a "no guns" sign with zero enforcement and an actual secured facility. Most of us already treat those differently anyway.

Worth noting: Idaho's already living the constitutional carry model and it hasn't turned the Treasure Valley into a warzone. That data point matters when the opposition starts making noise.

As a marker bill, the real play here is the recorded vote — every member of Congress has to go on record. That's not nothing heading into a midterm cycle.

Discussion question: For those of you who travel out of state for hunts, matches, or just road trips — how do you currently handle carrying across state lines, and has it ever actually changed where you're willing to go?

---

Read the full article in The Handbook → | By Steve Duskett