Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. Handbook Discussions
  3. Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC)

Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Handbook Discussions
handbook
1 Posts 1 Posters 25 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    admin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Spent some time going down the FPC rabbit hole after a conversation at the LGS counter last week about where membership dollars actually go. Worth breaking down for anyone who's been on the fence about supporting them versus the usual suspects.

    FPC's stated goal is to "restore the essential right to keep and bear arms in the United States" through strategic litigation rather than traditional lobbying.

    The NRA spent decades playing the political endorsement game and writing checks to congressmen. FPC's bet is that durable wins come through the courts, not election cycles. After Bruen, that bet is looking smarter than it did ten years ago.

    The Fifth Circuit granted an injunction that specifically exempted FPC members from enforcement of the ATF pistol brace ban — converting membership dues into tangible legal protection.

    This is the one that made me take FPC seriously. If you own a braced pistol and you're in the Fifth Circuit, that injunction wasn't abstract — it was the difference between legal and not legal while the case wound through the courts. That's a membership benefit you can actually point to, not a bumper sticker and a hat.

    FPC president Brandon Combs issued a pointed statement noting that FPC had opposed the bump stock ban from day one — including when it was a Trump administration action.

    A lot of organizations went quiet on the bump stock ban because the politics were uncomfortable. FPC opposed it regardless of who was signing the rule. That consistency matters if you're trying to figure out whether an organization actually has principles or just has a team jersey.

    Worth noting they did take a 7-2 loss at the Supreme Court in VanDerStok on the ghost gun rule — so they're not batting a thousand. Anyone who tells you litigation is a clean strategy is selling something.


    For those of you who carry or own braced pistols — have you ever made a membership or donation decision based on specific litigation outcomes, or do you just pick an org and write the check?


    Read the full article in The Handbook → | By The Boise Gun Club Team

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    Register Login
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups