Draft Registration Now Automatic
-
Selective Service registration just became automatic for men 18–26. No form, no post office run — the federal government enrolled you while you weren't looking. That's worth a few minutes of your attention, because the constitutional ground under this is shakier than most people realize.
"The founders were explicitly suspicious of standing armies. Congress has to reauthorize Army funding every two years precisely because of that suspicion. When Secretary of War James Monroe proposed a national draft during the War of 1812, Rep. Daniel Webster called it unconstitutional on its face and warned it would fundamentally alter the relationship between citizen and state."
The same founders who wrote the Second Amendment and the militia clauses were also deeply uncomfortable with centralized military power over individual citizens. That's not a small footnote — that's the entire framing of the debate, and it got buried somewhere between 1918 and now.
"Chief Justice Roger Taney drafted an opinion concluding it exceeded Congress's powers, arguing that the authority to 'raise' an army did not include the power to compel service in it. No case reached the Supreme Court. That constitutional question was never litigated to resolution."
Most people assume this was settled long ago. It wasn't — not cleanly. The Civil War draft never got a final answer, and the 1918 ruling that did happen was built more on political convenience than constitutional rigor. Courts have overturned flimsier precedents for less.
"The 13th Amendment angle adds a second problem the 1918 court mostly sidestepped. Abolishing involuntary servitude 'except as punishment for a crime' would seem, on plain reading, to prohibit compelling military service under threat of imprisonment."
This is the one that doesn't get talked about enough. The same amendment used to abolish slavery, on a plain reading, applies here — and the court in 1918 waved it off in a few sentences. If Dobbs means anything, it means that kind of judicial hand-waving has a shorter shelf life now.
The community most vocal about the Second Amendment, individual liberty, and government overreach should probably have a strong opinion on whether the federal government can conscript your son at 18 and put him in a ground war in Iran or Venezuela. These issues aren't separate.
Has anyone here looked seriously at how this intersects with the militia clause arguments? Curious whether anyone sees a Second Amendment angle — or thinks this is a completely different legal lane.
Read the full article in The Handbook → | By Steve Duskett
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login