NodeBB

Savage REVEL: Lever-Action Rimfire Returns Savage Arms is bringing back the lever-action rimfire with their new REVEL series, unveiled at SHOT Show 2026. These aren't reproductions of century-old designs – they're modern takes on the classic lever .22 that taught millions of Americans to shoot. [image: mfr_savage_revel_vertical.webp] The REVEL comes in three chamberings: .22 LR, .22 WMR, and .17 HMR. What sets it apart is the takedown mechanism that lets you break the rifle down for compact storage or transport. Think of it as the tactical folder of the rimfire world, but with way more soul. Why it matters: Lever-action rimfires were the training rifles that built American shooting culture. Your grandfather probably learned on one, and chances are good it's still sitting in someone's gun safe, still cycling rounds after 60 years. Savage is offering two variants – the Classic and the DLX. While specific details are still coming, expect the DLX to feature upgraded wood and possibly enhanced sights. Both models maintain that quick-handling characteristic that made lever rimfires so popular with young shooters and small-game hunters. The takedown feature addresses the biggest complaint about traditional lever guns: they're long and awkward to transport. Break this down and it'll fit in a backpack or small case, making it perfect for truck guns, cabin rifles, or teaching kids without wrestling a full-length rifle. Between the lines: This launch signals Savage recognizing what many of us already knew – there's serious nostalgia and practical demand for well-made lever rimfires. While other manufacturers chase the latest tactical trends, Savage is betting that sometimes the old ways were the right ways. "The REVEL brings together the timeless appeal of lever-action shooting with modern manufacturing quality and smart design features shooters actually want," said a Savage representative at the show. The .17 HMR option is particularly interesting. That cartridge turns a casual plinker into a legitimate varmint rifle, and the quick follow-up shots from a lever action could make prairie dog towns very nervous. The big picture: This isn't just about one rifle series. It's about manufacturers finally understanding that not every gun needs to be black, tactical, or optimized for home defense. Sometimes we just want something that's fun to shoot, easy to carry, and reminds us why we fell in love with firearms in the first place. Pricing hasn't been announced, but expect these to land somewhere between budget plinkers and premium hunting rifles. If Savage gets the price point right, they could own this market segment. The bottom line: The REVEL series proves there's still room for classic designs with modern improvements. For anyone who's ever wanted a lever rimfire that doesn't require a trip to a gunsmith every few years, this could be exactly what you've been waiting for. Go deeper: SHOT Show 2026 coverage Savage Arms product lineup Lever-action rimfire buyer's guide Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion Anyone eyeing the takedown feature for these—thinking travel gun, or is the modularity more about storage and maintenance for you?

Texas GOP Proposes Constitutional Carry Expansion Gun Owners of America Texas has proposed five Second Amendment resolutions for the 2026 Republican Party of Texas platform, pushing to expand constitutional carry rights and strengthen self-defense protections. The proposals target age restrictions that federal courts have already ruled unconstitutional, along with gaps in Texas self-defense law that leave justified defenders vulnerable to prosecution and civil lawsuits. Why it matters: These platform planks could drive the 2025 legislative agenda if adopted, potentially making Texas the most gun-friendly state in the nation. The proposals build on momentum from recent legislative wins, including new laws that took effect January 1st allowing short-barrel firearms and banning red flag orders. GOA Texas is leveraging successful court challenges like Andrews v. McCraw to push lawmakers beyond incremental reforms. The big picture: The proposed changes reflect a coordinated strategy to align Texas law with recent federal court rulings on Second Amendment rights. Federal courts have repeatedly struck down age-based restrictions on carry rights for adults 18-20. Current Texas law still contains the unconstitutional provisions, creating confusion for law enforcement and legal gun owners. What they're proposing: The five resolutions cover constitutional carry expansion, self-defense protections, and civil immunity reforms. Age equality: Allow adults 18-20 to carry handguns and obtain licenses, matching rights already recognized by federal courts. Pre-trial hearings: Create a mechanism for justified defenders to assert self-defense claims before trial, rather than waiting months or years. Civil immunity: Provide presumptive immunity and attorney fee recovery for cleared defenders facing frivolous lawsuits. Expanded justification: Allow force or deadly force to prevent any violent felony, not just current enumerated crimes. Threat defense: Protect licensed carriers who display weapons to deter unlawful force from aggravated assault charges. Between the lines: The timing isn't coincidental—these proposals come as Texas lawmakers have already passed several pro-gun bills in recent sessions. Senate Bill 1362 banned enforcement of out-of-state red flag orders, making it a felony for officials to confiscate guns under civil protection orders. Senate Bill 1596 eliminated state penalties for owning unregistered short-barrel rifles and shotguns. Senate Bill 3053 completely banned local gun buyback programs. The self-defense gap: Current Texas law leaves justified defenders vulnerable even when they act lawfully. No pre-trial relief exists for self-defense claims, forcing innocent people through months of expensive litigation. Civil immunity provisions are weak, failing to deter frivolous lawsuits against justified defenders. Aggravated assault charges can still stick when someone displays a weapon to deter a threat, even if the threat would justify deadly force. What's already changed: Recent legislative sessions have steadily expanded gun rights while blocking new restrictions. House Bill 668 extended handgun license renewal deadlines to reduce administrative burdens. House Bill 1234 created an appeal process for medical denials of carry licenses. Senate Bill 706 established reciprocity with other states' carry permits. House Bill 1403 protected foster families from having to disclose firearm specifics to placement agencies. House Bill 1794 eliminated the ban on carrying at polling places during elections. By the numbers: Texas continues moving away from gun restrictions despite national trends. 21 states have red flag laws—Texas now explicitly bans them and makes enforcement a felony. Adults 18-20 can legally carry in Texas under constitutional carry, but still can't get licenses due to outdated statutes. $442 million in local tax revenue will be lost from business inventory exemptions—part of the broader deregulation push. What this means for you: If adopted, these platform planks would likely drive legislative priorities for the next session. Young adults would gain full carry rights with licensing options for reciprocity. Self-defense cases would get faster resolution through pre-trial hearings. Civil lawsuits against justified defenders would face stronger deterrents. Violent crime victims would have clearer legal protection when using force. The bottom line: Texas Republicans are positioning the state as the national leader on Second Amendment rights, using court victories to push beyond traditional legislative incrementalism. Go deeper: GOA Texas proposed platform resolutions Texas Tribune coverage of recent gun legislation NRA-ILA analysis of Texas House bills Overview of new Texas laws taking effect Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion If constitutional carry does get expanded to 18-year-olds in Texas, do you think that's the right move, or are there practical training/safety concerns worth considering at that age?

Reciprocity Bill Advances Amid Administration Backlash House committee advanced the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act (H.R. 38) on March 25, requiring states to recognize out-of-state concealed carry permits—as Trump administration officials face fierce criticism for threatening to jail legal gun owners. The bill would force all states to honor concealed carry licenses from any other state, even those with minimal training requirements or constitutional carry laws. 189 cosponsors have signed on, including 188 Republicans and one Democrat. The legislation has a 37% chance of becoming law according to GovTrack analysis. Why it matters: The push comes as gun rights groups blast the Trump administration for attacking Second Amendment rights following the Minneapolis shooting of Alex Pretti, a licensed concealed carrier. Gun Owners of America called out federal prosecutors who suggested carrying at protests justifies deadly force. The NRA attacked Trump appointee Bill Essayli for "demonizing law-abiding citizens" after he defended the shooting. Multiple Republican congressmen publicly defied U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro's threat to jail anyone carrying guns in D.C., even with valid licenses. Between the lines: The timing isn't coincidental—reciprocity supporters are using the administration's missteps to build momentum for federal legislation. Rep. Greg Steube posted "Come and take it!" directly challenging Pirro's enforcement threats. Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie noted that non-residents can already get D.C. permits, undermining Pirro's legal reasoning. Gun rights groups are demanding action on H.R. 38 to prevent future incidents where legal carriers face prosecution. What the bill would do: The Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act would create a federal framework overriding state-by-state recognition systems. Current patchwork: States can choose which out-of-state permits to honor, creating legal traps for travelers. The bill would require recognition of all state permits and constitutional carry from permitless states. Critics argue it would force strict permit states to accept carriers from states with minimal standards. The contradiction: Trump officials are simultaneously pushing legislation to expand gun rights while justifying the killing of a legal gun owner. The administration sued D.C. in December to overturn rifle restrictions as unconstitutional. Same prosecutors now argue lawful gun possession at protests justifies lethal force. White House press secretary said Americans "absolutely" have Second Amendment rights while defending federal agents who shot an armed citizen. By the numbers: Reciprocity enjoys broad support among gun owners but faces opposition from gun control groups. Three in four Americans oppose permitless carry according to Pew Research. Everytown argues reciprocity would allow "violent criminals, domestic abusers, and convicted stalkers" to carry in restrictive states. Concealed carry permit holders statistically commit crimes at lower rates than police officers. What's next: The bill advances to a full House vote with strong Republican support, though Senate passage remains uncertain. Speaker Johnson has committed to bringing H.R. 38 to the floor this session. The administration's gun rights controversy may actually help build pressure for passage. Legal challenges would likely follow if signed into law, setting up Supreme Court review. The bottom line: The Minneapolis shooting and D.C. threats have inadvertently strengthened the case for national reciprocity by highlighting how current laws criminalize lawful behavior. Go deeper: H.R. 38 bill status and text Everytown opposition arguments Gun rights groups respond to Trump DOJ threats Trump administration Second Amendment controversy Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion How many of you actually travel between states regularly enough that reciprocity would change how you carry, or is it more of a principle thing for you?

Colt CZ Buys Nitrocellulose Maker Colt CZ Group announced it will acquire Czech nitrocellulose producer Synthesia Nitrocellulose in a $1.05 billion deal, securing a critical supply chain component as ammunition demand surges across NATO countries. The Czech firearms manufacturer will buy a 51% stake initially through cash and stock, with an option to acquire the remaining 49% later. The transaction values Synthesia at 22 billion Czech crowns and is expected to close by Q1 2026 pending regulatory approvals. Why it matters: This gives Colt CZ control over one of only three major nitrocellulose producers serving Europe and North America—the key ingredient in smokeless powder for all modern ammunition. Synthesia produces 6,000 tons annually of energetic nitrocellulose, expanding to 7,000 tons soon. Supply constraints have hit the explosives market hard due to surging defense demand from the Ukraine conflict. The deal reduces dependence on China, which supplies over 70% of the cotton linters used to make nitrocellulose. Between the lines: Colt CZ is making a strategic bet on vertical integration as ammunition becomes as valuable as the guns that fire it. The company specifically cited plans to expand into "medium and large-caliber ammunition" production—the heavy artillery rounds in massive demand. NATO countries are scrambling to rebuild ammunition stockpiles depleted by aid to Ukraine. This moves Colt CZ from primarily a small arms manufacturer into the lucrative heavy weapons supply chain. By the numbers: The deal reflects the premium companies will pay for ammunition supply security. $1.05 billion transaction price represents 8.2 times Synthesia's expected 2025 earnings. 40% of the purchase will be paid in new Colt CZ shares, making Synthesia's parent company Kaprain the third-largest Colt shareholder. $66.5 million additional deal for Synthesia's energy division, paid entirely in Colt stock. Synthesia Nitrocellulose was spun off in December 2024 from chemical giant Synthesia a.s., which has supplied energetic materials across Europe for decades. The company operates production facilities at the Semtín and Rybitví industrial complexes in the Czech Republic. Colt CZ Chairman Jan Drahota said the acquisition supports "strategic independence and self-sufficiency of the Czech Republic and NATO countries in defense supplies." The company operates facilities across the US, Canada, Sweden, Hungary, and Switzerland after acquiring the historic American Colt brand in 2021. What this means for you: Ammunition supply chains are consolidating rapidly, which could affect both availability and pricing for civilian shooters. Major manufacturers are prioritizing military and law enforcement contracts over commercial sales. Vertical integration like this deal typically leads to more stable supply but potentially higher prices as competition decreases. Expect continued emphasis on defense production over sporting ammunition in the near term. The nitrocellulose market has faced particular strain due to geopolitical tensions. German defense contractor Rheinmetall's CEO warned last year about over-dependence on Chinese cotton linters, the raw material base for nitrocellulose production. The bottom line: Colt CZ is positioning itself as a full-spectrum ammunition supplier just as NATO countries realize their stockpiles aren't nearly deep enough for sustained conflict. Go deeper: Czech Trade Offices announcement LinkedIn analysis of the deal structure Il Sole 24 Ore coverage of supply chain concerns iTiger financial details Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion With Colt CZ locking up their own nitrocellulose supply chain, do you think we'll see more stable ammo prices and availability, or is this more about them securing their own margins?

Ninth Circuit Strikes California Open-Carry Ban The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down California's urban open-carry ban Friday, ruling the state cannot prohibit permits in counties with populations over 200,000—covering 95% of Californians. The 2-1 decision in Baird v. Bonta applies the Supreme Court's Bruen standard. Open carry "predates ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791" and remains legal in over 30 states. California argued it could ban open carry since concealed carry permits are available, but the court rejected this entirely. Why it matters: This creates a direct circuit split with the Second Circuit and puts California's "ban one mode, allow another" approach to carry laws on shaky ground nationwide. "Concealed and open carry are not fungible under the Nation's historical tradition." — Ninth Circuit majority ruling California's own conduct undermines its rural licensing claims. The state admits "no record of even one open-carry license being issued" anywhere. Mark Baird of Siskiyou County couldn't obtain a permit despite living in a county that supposedly allows them. Judge Lee's concurrence noted the state uses "subterfuge" with a 17-page form that "nowhere mentions open carry." Plaintiff Baird framed the issue plainly: "Do we have enumerated rights or don't we? This has less to do with the gun than it does the liberty." Judge VanDyke, writing for the majority, agreed: "Bruen does not permit a state to ban one mode of carry simply because another is allowed." Judge Smith dissented, arguing states should be able to "eliminate one mode so long as it does not ban public carry altogether." This ruling creates tension with the Second Circuit's 2025 Frey v. City of New York decision, which upheld New York's open-carry ban. Circuit splits often draw Supreme Court attention, and the conflict over whether states can eliminate one carry method while allowing another is now ripe for SCOTUS review. What's next: California Attorney General Rob Bonta says his office is "considering its options." The case could go to the full Ninth Circuit en banc Or create enough of a circuit split for Supreme Court review Open carry remains illegal while enforcement continues California's legislature—not courts—must craft any replacement permitting system The bottom line: California can no longer categorically refuse open-carry permits in its major population centers, but the practical impact depends on how local sheriffs and police chiefs respond to permit applications. Go deeper: Full Ninth Circuit decision analysis CNN coverage of the ruling Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion How do you think this ruling might actually play out in practice here in Idaho—does it change how you're thinking about carry options, or does it mainly affect folks dealing with California's restrictions?

Staccato HD C4X Debuts Staccato unveiled the HD C4X at SHOT Show 2026, bringing their high-performance HD platform into a compact 4-inch barrel format designed for both duty carry and personal protection. The pistol was co-developed with an elite law enforcement special-surveillance team to meet real-world operational demands. This marks Staccato's serious push into the compact duty market with a pistol that bridges competition guns and practical carry weapons. Why it matters: The HD C4X maintains HD family features—ambidextrous controls, 15-round capacity, HD HOST optic-mounting—while delivering a smaller package for easier concealment. Glock-pattern magazine compatibility keeps logistics simple for agencies. "We set out to create a compact and extremely versatile pistol that can confidently be carried on duty, for personal protection, or both." — Paul Smith, VP Product, Staccato The HD C4X launches February 16 through authorized dealers at $3,499 across three configurations. The 4-inch barrel balances concealability with sufficient velocity, and the platform maintains the 2011's inherent accuracy advantage over striker-fired alternatives. Staccato's expansion comes as the 2011 platform gains wider acceptance beyond competition shooting. The company is positioning as a premium option for professionals wanting race-gun performance in a duty-ready package. At $3,499, it competes with custom shop offerings from traditional manufacturers. Staccato also announced the formation of Staccato Training Group (STG) alongside the pistol launch. Led by Max Michel, newly appointed VP of training and competition, the professional certification program launches spring 2026. It aims to certify U.S.-based firearms and tactical instructors under a unified standard, potentially expanding access to local, certified training nationwide. Specs at a glance: MSRP: Starting at $3,499 Barrel: 4 inches Capacity: 15+1 rounds Features: Ambidextrous controls, Glock mag pattern, HD HOST optic system The bottom line: At $3,499, the HD C4X sits firmly in premium territory, but it offers 2011 platform advantages that traditional striker-fired duty guns can't match. For agencies and individuals prioritizing performance over budget, it could be a compelling option. Go deeper: Staccato HD C4X announcement Best Guns of SHOT Show 2026 Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion Has anyone here made the jump from a traditional duty gun to a 2011 platform, and was the learning curve worth it for you, or would you stick with what you know?

Lane Dominates USPSA Limited Division Crown Mason Lane of Team SIG torched the competition at the 2025 USPSA Race Gun Nationals, claiming the Limited division championship with a dominant 2213.8829 score—a commanding 39-point margin over second place. The October 24-26 event in Hurricane, Utah drew 616 competitors, making it the largest single Nationals in USPSA history. Southern Utah Practical Shooters hosted the match across 19 demanding stages that tested every aspect of practical shooting skills. Why it matters: USPSA Limited division represents the pinnacle of iron-sight competition shooting. Winning by 39 points in a field this size isn't just victory—it's domination. Lane didn't squeak by; he controlled the match from start to finish. His 2024 move to Team SIG's professional roster is paying dividends—elite support meeting elite performance Limited division showcases high-end race guns without optics, testing pure shooting skill Lane stuck with iron sights and made them sing across Southern Utah's rugged terrain The sponsorship deal recognized his existing talent, and this Utah victory proves the partnership works both ways. By the numbers: At 616 shooters, this year's Race Gun Nationals shattered previous attendance records. The 19-stage course demanded consistency across varied shooting challenges, making Lane's 39-point victory margin even more impressive in context. 616 shooters—largest single Nationals in USPSA history 19 stages over 3 days in Hurricane, Utah Lane's 2213.8829 score ranked among top performances across all divisions 39-point margin of victory His ability to maintain that pace through nearly 20 stages speaks to both physical conditioning and mental toughness under pressure. The Team SIG connection runs deeper than equipment support. Lane joined their professional roster in 2024 after building a resume of major national titles and international competition experience. This Limited division crown adds another chapter to what's becoming a standout career. The competition: Other division champions included Christian Sailer taking Open with 2258.4206, Max Leograndis winning Pistol-Caliber Carbine at 2195.1993, Adam Grimm claiming Limited Optics with 2155.3315, and Shane Coley topping Limited 10 at 2274.4803. Christian Sailer: Open, 2258.4206 Max Leograndis: Pistol-Caliber Carbine, 2195.1993 Adam Grimm: Limited Optics, 2155.3315 Shane Coley: Limited 10, 2274.4803 Coley's Limited 10 score actually topped Lane's by about 60 points, but Limited 10's capacity restrictions create different stage strategies. Lane faced the full-capacity Limited field where raw speed and accuracy combine without artificial constraints. What's next: This victory positions Lane as a serious contender heading into 2026's major matches. The combination of Team SIG support and proven match-day performance creates momentum that's hard to stop once it builds. USPSA season builds toward next year's World Shoot His 39-point margin suggests he's hitting peak form at exactly the right time International recognition could follow if this dominance continues Go deeper: Full match results at USPSA website Team SIG information Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion What's it take to consistently dominate at that level—are we talking pure trigger time, specific training methods, or does equipment tuning make the real difference?

ATF Drops Drug User Gun Ban The ATF just rewrote the rules on who can buy guns if they've used drugs. Starting June 30, the agency's new interim final rule drops the blanket ban on anyone who's ever touched marijuana or other controlled substances—replacing it with a narrower standard focused on "compulsive" or "regular" current users. The change comes as the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in March on U.S. v. Hemani, a case that could gut the federal drug prohibition entirely. Multiple federal appeals courts have already ruled the current ban unconstitutional under the Bruen decision's historical test. Why it matters: This affects millions of gun owners in the 24 states where recreational marijuana is legal, plus medical marijuana patients nationwide. Under the old rule, checking "yes" on that drug question meant an automatic denial—even for a single joint years ago The new rule redefines a prohibited "unlawful user" as someone "who regularly uses a controlled substance over an extended period of time continuing into the present" Medical marijuana patients get explicit protection if they have a lawful prescription ATF data shows single-incident drug use resulted in about half of all drug-based gun purchase denials last fiscal year Federal courts have been hammering the drug prohibition since Bruen required historical justification for gun restrictions. The Fifth Circuit ruled the ban unconstitutional as applied to nonviolent marijuana users, writing that history "may support some limits on a presently intoxicated person's right to carry" but doesn't "support disarming a sober person based solely on past substance usage." This rule change could restore gun rights to hundreds of thousands of Americans. "A victory for patient access and Second Amendment rights." — Nikki Fried, Florida Democratic Party Chair The ATF is clearly trying to thread the needle before the Supreme Court potentially nukes the entire drug prohibition. By narrowing the rule proactively, they're hoping to preserve some federal authority. The Hemani case presents a less sympathetic defendant—someone accused of using cocaine "every other day"—which may help the government's position. Reactions have been surprisingly bipartisan. The NRA-ILA supported the narrowing while pushing for broader reform, while Everytown argued in court filings that the broad prohibition is "as old as legislative recognition of the drug problem itself." What's next: The interim rule takes effect June 30, but the Supreme Court decision in Hemani could make it irrelevant. If the Court strikes down the drug prohibition entirely, ATF forms might need another rewrite by fall The 30-day comment period could still produce modifications Gun owners should maintain current documentation until the rule is official The bottom line: The ATF blinked before the Supreme Court could force its hand. For millions of gun owners in legal-weed states, that's good news—assuming the rule survives. Go deeper: NRA-ILA: ATF Rewrites Rules for Addicts/Unlawful Drug Users Second Amendment News: Feds propose path to gun ownership Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion For those of you in states with legal cannabis, does this change actually affect how you think about your firearms collection, or was the old rule already pretty much a non-issue for you?

IPSC Shotgun Team USA Announced IPSC-USA announced the Team USA roster for the 2026 Shotgun World Shoot on January 14, 2026. The match takes place in Corinth, Greece, this fall. Why it matters: The World Shoot is the pinnacle of IPSC competition, where qualifiers earned their slots through a demanding multi-match series. The competition will unfold at Corinth Shooting Range, located 80 kilometers from Athens. The event spans nearly two weeks, beginning with a pre-match period and culminating in championship shoot-offs. By the numbers: The timeline is packed. Sept. 21-25 — Pre-Match Sept. 27 — Opening Ceremony Sept. 28 - Oct. 3 — Main Match Oct. 4 — Shoot-Off and Awards Team organizers issued a critical travel warning for competitors: avoid flying through London with firearms. Some competitors have faced arrest attempting this route, making alternative connections essential. The team will gather for dinner on September 25, 2026, at 7 PM—a final moment of unity before competition begins. The bottom line: The roster is set and Greece awaits America's finest shotgun competitors. Go deeper: Action Gunner Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion Anyone here competed in IPSC shotgun matches locally, and if so, what's been your experience comparing it to rifle or pistol competitions?

H&N Cup Munich: Norway Leads Medal Count Norway topped the medal count at the 2026 H&N Cup in Munich, claiming five gold medals as the prestigious air gun competition wrapped up January 25. Germany and Serbia each followed with four golds in the season's first major international shooting event. The competition drew over 700 competitors from more than 55 nations to Munich's historic 1972 Olympic Shooting Range, setting the stage for what promises to be an intense 2026 ISSF season. Why it matters: The H&N Cup serves as the first major "stress test" for Olympic-level competitors each year, giving athletes and coaches an early read on form and competition heading into the season. Serbia's pistol shooters emerged as the dominant force across multiple events. Zorana Arunovic captured the women's air pistol title, while Damir Mikec secured the men's championship, showcasing the depth of Serbia's pistol program. By the numbers: The competition's scale was impressive. 700+ competitors from around the world 55+ nations represented 5 days of competition from January 21-25 13 total medal events contested Italy also made its mark in junior competition, with Sara Tomaello taking gold in the junior women's air pistol event. The strong international showing across age groups highlighted the global depth in air gun competition. "This event gives us our first real look at where everyone stands heading into the new season. The competition level was exceptionally high." — Tournament Director (via Hard Air Magazine) The Munich venue, which hosted shooting events during the 1972 Olympics, provided a fitting backdrop for the international competition. Athletes competed across both senior and junior categories in air pistol and air rifle events. The bottom line: Serbia's pistol dominance and Norway's overall medal success signal strong early-season form as the 2026 ISSF circuit officially gets underway. Go deeper: Hard Air Magazine Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion Are any of you competing in or planning to attend international shooting competitions like the H&N Cup, or is that more of a bucket-list thing for most folks here?

USA Shooting Names 2026 Shotgun Teams USA Shooting announced its 2026 Shotgun National Teams on December 11, 2025, following the Fall Selection Match in Tucson, Arizona. These athletes will represent the United States at major international competitions throughout the year. The selection process combined results from two critical events—the 2025 Hillsdale National Championship and the 2025 Tucson Selection Match. Athletes battled through multi-round qualification and ISSF-format finals, with desert conditions shifting constantly throughout the competition. Why it matters: These teams will carry America's hopes at ISSF World Cups in Morocco and Kazakhstan, while junior athletes head to prestigious competitions in Cairo and Suhl. Several events came down to dramatic shoot-offs as competitors pushed for national team spots. The intense selection process ensured only the most consistent performers earned their spots. By the numbers: The competition results tell the story of razor-thin margins. 244 — Sam Simonton's winning score in Women's Skeet 242 — Dania Vizzi's second-place finish 238 — Gracie Hensley's third-place score "The U.S. enters 2026 with experienced veterans and juniors who proved they belong on the world stage." The newly selected athletes now shift focus to their upcoming international assignments. The ISSF World Cup circuit begins with competition in Tangier, Morocco, followed by events in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Junior team members will compete at the ISSF Junior World Cup in Cairo, Egypt, and other international venues including Suhl. The bottom line: Team USA's shotgun program has identified its top talent for what promises to be a competitive 2026 season on the international stage. Go deeper: USA Shooting Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion Anyone here competing in shotgun disciplines – are you working toward making a national team, or is that more of a "nice to have" goal compared to just improving your scores?

Industry Eyes NFA Constitutional Challenge A coalition of firearms manufacturers and advocacy groups is challenging the National Firearms Act in federal court, arguing that with the tax stamp fee reduced to zero, the constitutional basis for the entire regulatory framework has collapsed. The lawsuit, Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF, was filed on July 4, 2025, in the Northern District of Texas. By August, 15 states including Idaho had joined as plaintiffs alongside the Silencer Shop Foundation, Gun Owners of America, SilencerCo, B&T USA, and Palmetto State Armory. Why it matters: The NFA was upheld by the Supreme Court in 1937 as a valid exercise of Congress's taxing power. If there's no tax being collected, plaintiffs argue there's no constitutional authority to maintain the regulations. The legal strategy hinges on the Supreme Court's 1937 Sonzinsky decision, which specifically validated the NFA as a tax measure rather than a direct regulation of firearms. With Congress having zeroed out the tax stamp fee, plaintiffs contend the constitutional foundation cited in that landmark ruling no longer exists. The government is expected to defend the regulations under the Commerce Clause, arguing that federal authority to regulate interstate commerce provides sufficient constitutional basis regardless of the tax component. "The $0 tax created a legal opening that constitutional scholars have been debating since the fee reduction was announced." The case is moving quickly through the courts. Plaintiffs filed their motion for summary judgment on October 7, 2025, seeking a definitive ruling without a lengthy trial process. The timing suggests both sides view this as primarily a question of constitutional law rather than disputed facts. The bottom line: Whether courts will accept that eliminating the tax eliminates congressional authority remains an open question that could take months to resolve, but the legal theory has created the most significant challenge to NFA authority in decades. Go deeper: The Reload Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion Do you think a successful NFA challenge would actually change how you approach suppressors and short-barrel rifles, or would it just be a legal win that doesn't affect much on the ground?

SCOTUS Sets Hemani Gun Arguments The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. Hemani on March 2, 2026. The case asks whether the federal ban on gun possession by drug users is constitutional. Ali Danial Hemani, a Texas man, was charged under 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) after FBI agents found a Glock 9mm, marijuana, and cocaine in his home. The lower courts ruled that the law can't be enforced just because someone is a "regular drug user"—the government must prove the person was under the influence at the time of arrest. Why it matters: If the Court strikes down the law, millions of Americans in states with legal marijuana could legally own firearms. If it upholds the ban, the Hunter Biden precedent stays intact. The legal arguments reveal a sharp divide over how to interpret historical gun regulations in the modern era. What they're saying: The Government: The law "imposes a limited, inherently temporary restriction" removable by "ceasing unlawful drug use" Hemani's Lawyers: History only supports disarming people who are currently intoxicated By the numbers: The scope of impact is massive. 38 states have legalized marijuana in some form Millions of legal marijuana users currently prohibited from gun ownership 1 precedent at stake—the Hunter Biden conviction "History only supports disarming people who are currently intoxicated." — Hemani's legal team The bottom line: March 2 arguments will determine whether legal marijuana use permanently bars gun ownership. Decision expected by late June. Go deeper: SCOTUSblog Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion How do you think this case could affect carry permits or background checks for people with prior drug convictions—does the distinction between current users versus past offenders matter to you?

The Pretti Shooting: A Test for Gun Rights A licensed CCW holder was shot at least ten times by federal agents in Minneapolis on January 25—after being disarmed and pinned face-down on the pavement. Why it matters: The Trump administration is now arguing that legally carrying near law enforcement is grounds for lethal force. That affects every gun owner in America. What Happened Alex Pretti, 37, was an ICU nurse at a VA hospital. He lived less than two miles from where he died. He was recording Border Patrol agents on his phone. When he saw one knock a woman to the ground, he moved to help her up. Within seconds: pepper-sprayed, tackled by six or seven agents, disarmed, shot. The timing: Watch the video. An agent removes Pretti's firearm and steps away. About one second later—while Pretti is still face-down—a shot is fired. Then a pause. About three seconds. Then nine more shots in rapid succession. What that pattern suggests: If this were a controlled shoot—an intentional decision to neutralize a threat—you'd expect tight grouping. Shoot until the threat stops. That's training. One shot, a pause, then a mag dump? That's the pattern of something going wrong followed by panic fire. The geometry: The first shooter was positioned directly behind Pretti. He would have had eyes on the disarm. What Minneapolis PD confirmed: Pretti had a valid carry permit. No serious criminal history. His weapon was still holstered when he was tackled. [image: wc_federal_agents_minneapolis.webp] Federal agents on Nicollet Avenue, Minneapolis. Photo: Chad Davis / CC BY 4.0 The Official Story vs. The Footage What DHS said: Secretary Kristi Noem called Pretti a "domestic terrorist" who came to "inflict maximum damage." What the video shows: A guy with a cell phone trying to help a woman off the ground. He never drew. He never brandished. He was disarmed when he was killed. The dangerous part: First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli posted that "if you approach law enforcement with a gun, there is a high likelihood they will be legally justified in shooting you." Not draw on law enforcement. Approach them—while legally carrying. 2A Groups Noticed What they're saying: Gun rights organizations across the political spectrum recognized the threat immediately. NRA called Essayli's statement "dangerous and wrong"—a rare rebuke of a Trump administration official. Gun Owners of America condemned it as an affront to the Second Amendment. Minnesota Gun Owners Law Center: "You don't have to pick between which rights you exercise." Between the lines: When the NRA and the Liberal Gun Club issue joint condemnations, something significant just happened. The Contradiction The contradiction: The same administration is arguing both sides of the Second Amendment. Last week: The Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to strike down Hawaii's carry restrictions—a Second Amendment violation, they argued. This week: The same administration says a man legally carrying in an open-carry state brought his death upon himself. The bottom line: Either Americans have the right to carry firearms in public, or they don't. You can't argue both. What's Next The FBI is leading the investigation. A federal judge issued a TRO requiring DHS to preserve evidence. Minnesota AG Keith Ellison called it "uncharted territory." Go deeper: Video evidence has been verified by Reuters, BBC, WSJ, AP, and CNN. Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O'Hara confirmed the permit status. Multiple 2A organizations have called for investigation. The Bigger Question A community member put it better than I can: "A 'good guy' with a gun—legally owned and permitted—was protecting an unarmed woman from a masked agent of the federal government. This scenario is literally a combination of every major defense that 2A folks have made since Columbine. If the 2A community cannot stand on principle in this instance, then their principled arguments deserve to be ignored in the future." This isn't about Pretti's politics or whether you'd have been at that protest. It's about whether "legally carrying near law enforcement" is now de facto justification for lethal force. This is opinion. Review the video and form your own conclusions. Related: Carrying at Protests: What CCW Holders Need to Know Recording Law Enforcement: Know Your Rights Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion If you've watched the video, what's your take on how it changes—or doesn't change—your thinking about the legal protections CCW holders actually have in these situations?

Suppressors Surge After Tax Elimination Gun owners flooded the ATF with 150,000 suppressor applications on January 1—the first day the federal $200 tax stamp dropped to zero. That's a 6,000 percent increase from the typical daily volume of 2,500 applications. The surge was so massive it crashed the ATF's eForms system throughout New Year's Day, leaving dealers and buyers dealing with intermittent glitches and delays nationwide. Why it matters: This isn't just about saving $200. The tax elimination removes the biggest barrier that's kept suppressors out of reach for most gun owners since 1934. 4.4 million suppressors already in circulation—up from just 300,000 in 2011 About 35 percent of recent buyers were first-timers With the cost barrier gone, expect those numbers to explode The tax elimination came through Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" signed last July 4th. It was a budget reconciliation measure, which means it could only touch tax and fiscal issues—not the underlying NFA registration requirements. "January 1st, 2026 will go down as the day suppressors went mainstream." — NSSF Industry Statement Suppressor companies saw this coming and many covered the $200 tax through rebates in late 2025, giving buyers a preview of the zero-tax world. Even with those programs reducing demand, New Year's Day still brought unprecedented volume. What hasn't changed is everything else about the NFA process. You still need to file Form 4, submit fingerprints and photos, pass a background check, and wait for ATF approval. By the numbers: The growth trajectory is staggering. 150,000 applications on Day 1 alone 6,000% increase from typical daily volume 4.4 million suppressors in circulation by early 2025 265% market growth from 2020 to 2024 The bottom line: The ATF better get used to it—2026 is shaping up to be the year of the suppressor. Go deeper: NSSF: 2026 Could Be The Year Of Suppressors American Rifleman: 150,000 NFA Applications Filed On Day 1 Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion With suppressor applications skyrocketing now that the tax is gone, are you actually planning to grab one, or does the whole Form 4 wait time still feel like a pain?

Pistol Brace Rule Vacated by Courts Federal courts vacated the ATF's pistol brace rule in 2024, making stabilizing braces legal again under federal law after a year-long legal battle that threatened millions of gun owners with felony charges. The ATF's 2023 final rule (2021R-08F) took effect January 31, 2023, giving owners until May 31, 2023 to register their firearms or face federal charges. Industry experts estimated 10-40 million Americans owned pistols with stabilizing braces—devices originally designed to help disabled shooters stabilize firearms against their forearm. Why it matters: The rule would have reclassified commonly owned braced pistols as short-barreled rifles, requiring NFA registration and a $200 tax stamp. Possession without compliance carried up to 10 years in prison and $250,000 in fines. Between the lines: The rule created a regulatory nightmare where factors like weight, marketing materials, and even social media posts could trigger SBR classification. A pistol's design, overall length, or manufacturer suggestions about shouldering the brace could suddenly make legal owners into federal criminals. Multiple court challenges emerged across the country, with gun rights groups and individual plaintiffs arguing the ATF exceeded its authority by effectively rewriting federal law through regulation. Congress also pushed back—Representative Dale Strong (AL-05) introduced H.J.Res.44 under the Congressional Review Act to overturn the rule. "Gun makers have exploited arm braces for profit, allowing shooters to turn any short-barreled firearm into a rifle and making weapons of war like AR-15s even deadlier." — Everytown spokesperson Gun control groups defended the rule, with the Brady Campaign citing stabilizing braces' use in mass shootings and GIFFORDS arguing the rule "ensures that all forms of short-barreled rifles are regulated under the National Firearms Act." Strong countered by calling it "a blatant attack by the Biden Administration on our Second Amendment rights." As of July 2025, pistol braces remain legal under federal regulations following court decisions including Mock v. Garland. However, the legal landscape continues shifting with upcoming changes to NFA items. By the numbers: Starting January 1, 2026, H.R. 1 eliminates costs for NFA items: $0 tax for suppressors, short-barreled rifles, and short-barreled shotguns Registration requirements remain in place No impact on pistol braces, which courts determined don't qualify as stocks The ATF clarified in January 2025 that claims labeling "all braced pistols as short-barreled rifles were overbroad," walking back earlier guidance while the agency faces ongoing litigation over its regulatory authority. The bottom line: Pistol braces are currently legal, but the regulatory whiplash demonstrates how administrative rules can instantly criminalize millions of law-abiding gun owners—highlighting broader concerns about federal agencies creating criminal law through regulation rather than congressional action. Go deeper: Strong takes action to stop ATF Pistol Brace Rule ATF Changes in 2025: What Every FFL Needs to Know National Gun Violence Prevention Groups Fight to Uphold ATF's Life-Saving Stabilizing Brace Rule ATF Pistol Brace Rule: What the SBR Reclassification Means for You Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion If you've got a braced pistol sitting in your safe, are you actually planning to use it now that things have cleared up legally, or was the legal uncertainty the main thing holding you back?

Idaho 2026 Session Convenes The Idaho Legislature convened its 2026 session on January 12, with lawmakers facing an estimated $1 billion revenue shortfall that will dominate the agenda. While budget battles are expected to consume most of the session's attention, gun owners should remain engaged as legislative sessions can move quickly. Why it matters: Idaho already has strong Second Amendment protections, but sessions can move fast. Bills can appear, advance, and pass before most people notice. The budget problem represents the headline story this session. Idaho's revenue shortfall will force difficult conversations about spending priorities and potential cuts across state government. By the numbers: Key dates to watch this session. January 12 — Session opened February 16 — Deadline for constitutional amendments February 26 — Bill introduction deadline March 27 — Target adjournment Idaho's existing gun laws are already among the strongest in the nation. The state has constitutional carry with no permit required, no red flag law, state preemption of local gun laws, and stand your ground protections. "No major gun legislation is pending yet. Budget battles will consume most of the oxygen. But sessions move fast." Gun rights advocates have multiple resources for staying informed throughout the session. Organizations like NRA-ILA and Idaho Second Amendment Alliance provide regular updates, while the state legislature's website offers bill tracking capabilities. The bottom line: While budget concerns will drive most legislative activity, Second Amendment supporters should monitor developments as the session progresses. Go deeper: NRA-ILA Idaho SAA Bill Tracking Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion With a potential $1 billion budget shortfall looming, what do you think should be the legislature's priority—protecting funding for things like range safety programs and hunter education, or cutting taxes?

ATF eForms Crash Under Suppressor Surge The ATF's eForms system buckled on January 1, 2026, as 150,000 applications flooded in after the $0 tax stamp took effect. Users faced login errors, timeouts, and complete system crashes during the first 48 hours. The ATF anticipated the surge and shut down eForms on December 26 to upgrade server capacity. It wasn't enough. The system rejected valid PINs on submission, pages wouldn't load, and authentication failures plagued users trying to submit their paperwork. Why it matters: This represents the largest single-day volume in ATF history—a 5,900% increase over normal processing. Despite the chaos, some applications are moving through the system with approvals arriving in as little as 31 hours. The National Shooting Sports Foundation issued a bulletin on January 2 warning members: "ATF is experiencing intermittent IT system glitches and delays that are affecting industry members nationwide." The crashes affected login authentication, PIN validation, page loading, and caused complete system outages throughout the first two days. By the numbers: The scale of this surge is unprecedented. 150,000 applications on day one 2,500 applications on a normal day 31 hours for the fastest reported approval 3-7 million projected applications for all of 2026 "ATF is experiencing intermittent IT system glitches and delays that are affecting industry members nationwide." — National Shooting Sports Foundation bulletin The system is showing signs of recovery as server loads stabilize. Users who successfully submitted applications during the initial chaos are beginning to see movement on their paperwork, though processing times remain unpredictable. The bottom line: The system broke under historic demand but is stabilizing. Check your submission status if you got through—expect continued delays if you're still trying to submit. Go deeper: Pew Pew Tactical TTAG Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion Were you one of the folks trying to file that first day, or are you waiting to see if the site stabilizes before jumping in with your application?

SIG Releases P211-GT4, GT5 Pistols SIG SAUER launched two new hammer-fired pistols at SHOT Show 2026—the P211-GT4 and GT5—marking the company's continued expansion into the competition and duty pistol market. [image: sig_p211_gt5_left.webp] SIG Sauer P211-GT5 with 5-inch bull barrel and full-length steel frame. Image: SIG SAUER The P211 series represents SIG's first double-stack 1911 design, combining traditional hammer-fired operation with modern capacity and features. Both models use P320-compatible steel magazines, creating parts commonality across SIG's pistol lineup. Why it matters: SIG is directly challenging Springfield Armory's dominance in the double-stack 1911 market with serious competition features. The GT5's 5-inch bull barrel and full-length steel frame target competitive shooters and duty applications where accuracy matters most. Magazine compatibility with the military-adopted P320 creates logistical advantages for departments already running SIG pistols. The GT4's 4.2-inch barrel and low-profile magwell aim at concealed carry users who want 1911 ergonomics with modern capacity. Between the lines: This launch comes as the P320 faces ongoing legal challenges over alleged unintended discharge issues. SIG appears to be diversifying its striker-fired dominance with proven hammer-fired technology that sidesteps current P320 controversies. The timing coincides with military and law enforcement agencies showing renewed interest in hammer-fired backup options. By the numbers: Both pistols ship with substantial ammunition capacity for 1911-style firearms. GT5: Ships with two 21-round magazines plus one 17-round magazine GT4: Same magazine configuration despite shorter grip frame Barrel length: 5 inches (GT5) and 4.2 inches (GT4) with target crown finish Rail system: Both feature 3-slot Picatinny rails for accessories What this means for you: SIG's P211 series offers serious alternatives for shooters wanting 1911 ergonomics without single-stack limitations. The steel frame construction should handle heavy competition loads and extended training sessions better than polymer alternatives. P320 magazine compatibility means existing SIG users can leverage current magazine inventory. Multiple safety systems—grip safety, ambidextrous thumb safeties, and firing pin safety—address carry and duty requirements. The pistols feature straight-pull triggers designed for consistent breaks and precision-engineered alloy grip modules. Both models use steel frames with full-length dust covers on the GT5 and carry-length dust covers on the GT4. SIG displayed both pistols at booth 73039 during SHOT Show's January 20-23 run in Las Vegas. The company has not yet released pricing or availability dates for either model. The bottom line: SIG's entry into double-stack 1911s creates real competition in a market previously dominated by Springfield's 2011-style offerings, especially for agencies already invested in the SIG ecosystem. Go deeper: SIG Sauer P220 & P210 - The Foundation Pistols - How SIG's heritage pistol line led to the P211 SIG SAUER P211-GT4 and GT5 announcement SHOT Show 2026 industry trends overview Alex Pretti SIG P320 details from Minneapolis shooting Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion If you're already invested in P320 mags, does the idea of running those same magazines in a 1911 platform actually change the game for you, or does it feel more like a marketing angle?

Thermal Optics Hit 1280x1024 Four years ago, 640x512 was cutting-edge for thermal scopes. This week at SHOT Show, that resolution looks like watching Netflix on your old flip phone. The new standard is 1280x1024 sensors, and the difference isn't subtle. We're talking four times the pixel count, which translates to spotting details at distance that would've been invisible blobs on older thermals. Why it matters: You can now positively identify species and shot placement opportunities at ranges that used to require guesswork or getting closer. InfiRay's ACE S60R and Pulsar's Thermion 2 LRF 60 series are leading this resolution revolution. Both pack the new high-res sensors into packages that don't require a pack mule to carry. The real game-changer isn't just the pixel count though. These aren't just thermal scopes anymore – they're complete fire control systems. Built-in laser rangefinders give you exact yardage, while onboard ballistic calculators factor in your load data, environmental conditions, and cant angle. "It's like having a precision rifle team's worth of equipment packed into one optic," said Jake Morrison, a Texas hog guide who's been testing the ACE S60R. "Range, calculate, shoot – all without taking your eye off the target." Between the lines: This tech was military-only five years ago. Now it's trickling down to civilian hunters faster than anyone predicted, thanks to competition between thermal manufacturers. Hog hunters are the obvious beneficiaries here. Being able to distinguish a 200-pound boar from a 100-pound sow at 400 yards matters when you're trying to remove the biggest breeders from a sounder. The integrated rangefinding eliminates the fumbling around with handheld units that usually ends with spooked pigs. Predator hunters calling coyotes and foxes get similar advantages. That distant heat signature isn't just "something moving" anymore – you can see ear shape, tail carriage, and body proportions clearly enough to make species calls with confidence. By the numbers: The resolution jump from 640x512 to 1280x1024 represents 4x more thermal data. Effective identification range increases by roughly 40-50% for most targets. The ballistic integration deserves special mention. Upload your load data once, zero the scope, and the system handles holdovers automatically. Some models even account for spin drift on longer shots. Price-wise, expect to pay $8,000-12,000 for these high-res units with full fire control integration. That's actually reasonable when you consider you're replacing a thermal scope, laser rangefinder, ballistic computer, and cant indicator with one unit. The big picture: We're watching thermal optics mature from "expensive night vision alternative" to "precision shooting tool." The resolution bump is just the visible part – the real advancement is turning these into complete shooting solutions. The technology isn't perfect yet. Battery life takes a hit with all the processing power, and the learning curve is steeper than traditional scopes. But for serious night hunters, especially those dealing with agricultural pest control, these new thermals represent a significant capability jump. The bottom line: High-resolution thermal optics with integrated fire control are transforming night hunting from spray-and-pray to precision shooting. Go deeper: InfiRay ACE S60R full review and field testing Thermal scope battery management for extended hunts Legal considerations for thermal hunting by state Read the original article in The Handbook | By Steve Duskett Join the Discussion With thermal optics finally hitting that 1280x1024 resolution, are you thinking about making the jump, or does the price tag still feel hard to justify compared to what you're already running?