Supreme Court Boosts NFA Suppressor Cases

[admin]

The $200 NFA tax on suppressors and SBRs is gone thanks to the One Big Beautiful Bill, and the Second Amendment Foundation is now using that repeal as a crowbar on what's left of the registration requirements.

"The Supreme Court's recent opinions are binding precedent that should strengthen our cases challenging the remaining NFA registration requirements."
— Alan Gottlieb, SAF Founder

The argument is tighter than it sounds. The NFA's registration scheme was built on Congress's taxing power — no tax, no constitutional hook. SAF is essentially asking federal judges whether the whole structure can stand once you pull the foundation out.

The Bruen standard is doing real work here too. If suppressors and SBRs get formally recognized as protected arms — which these new rulings push toward — the government has to justify its restrictions against historical tradition. That's a much harder argument for the ATF to win than whatever they were arguing five years ago.

Worth being clear-eyed about where this actually sits: three lawsuits, lower federal courts, no rulings yet. The can is still being kicked, just with better kicks. If you've been waiting to buy a suppressor without the stamp and wait and the Form 4 headache, don't cancel your dealer's order quite yet.

For those of you who've gone through the NFA process — paid the tax, waited out the months — how are you thinking about what happens to that registration paperwork if the requirement eventually goes away?

---

Read the full article in The Handbook → | By Steve Duskett