Gatling Gun
-
Gatling's own reasoning for building the thing is one of the stranger origin stories in firearms history.
It occurred to me that if I could invent a machine—a gun—which could by its rapidity of fire, enable one man to do as much battle duty as a hundred, that it would, to a great extent, supersede the necessity of large armies.
He was trying to save lives by making killing more efficient. That logic doesn't fully hold up, but it's worth sitting with — the man who built one of the most fearsome weapons of the 19th century thought he was being humanitarian about it.
The cooling solution buried in this article is the part that actually impresses me as a shooter.
Each barrel spent most of its rotation cooling down—the elegant solution to every overheating problem that had defeated earlier designs.
Think about that the next time you're running a mag dump and your barrel gets uncomfortable to look at. The Gatling solved sustained fire in 1861 by distributing the heat load across multiple barrels — the same core principle behind every modern rotary cannon flying on attack aircraft today. The M134 minigun on a helicopter is a direct descendant of that same idea.
The Civil War service record section is the most honest thing in here, and it's worth reading twice.
Even Gatling's own grandson acknowledged in 1957 that "no one seems to know any anecdotes on the Civil War use of the gun."
Gun lore is full of this — the story everybody repeats that nobody can actually source. You hear the same thing at gun show tables and LGS counters constantly. The Gatling's Civil War legacy may be mostly postwar marketing dressed up as history, and the people most likely to have been loudest about it had product to sell.
The bureaucratic obstruction angle is what really stuck with me. Ripley blocked the Spencer, the Henry, the Sharps, and the Gatling — essentially the entire repeating-arms revolution of the Civil War — because he thought they wasted ammunition. Union soldiers were buying Spencers out of their own pay while their ordnance chief was still philosophically attached to single-shot doctrine.
What's a piece of gear — optic, caliber, carry method, whatever — that you resisted longer than you should have, and what finally changed your mind?
Read the full article in The Handbook → | By The Boise Gun Club Team
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login