Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

NodeBB

  1. Home
  2. Handbook Discussions
  3. NYSRPA v. Bruen (2022)

NYSRPA v. Bruen (2022)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Handbook Discussions
handbook
1 Posts 1 Posters 20 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    admin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Bruen doesn't get talked about enough at the local level, but it changed the legal landscape for every carry permit holder in this country — and if you live in a state that was still running a may-issue regime in 2022, you felt it directly.

    The Second Amendment "is the very product of an interest balancing by the people" — a constitutional guarantee subject to judges' case-by-case assessments is no constitutional guarantee at all.

    That line from Thomas's majority is the whole ballgame. For over a decade, federal courts were essentially doing a cost-benefit analysis on your right to carry — weighing your need against the government's interest in restricting you. That's not how any other enumerated right works, and the Court finally said so out loud.

    The Constitution presumptively protects conduct covered by the Second Amendment's plain text. The government must then demonstrate the regulation is consistent with the Nation's historical tradition of firearm regulation.

    What this means practically: if you're a law-abiding citizen and you want to carry a handgun in public, the burden is no longer on you to prove why you need it. It flips to the government to find a historical analogue for the restriction. That's a fundamental reversal — and it's why so many post-Bruen challenges to things like suppressor laws, pistol brace rules, and magazine capacity limits are now going back through the courts using this exact framework.

    Worth noting that Nash's original application was denied even after he cited a string of nearby robberies in his neighborhood. The licensing officer essentially told him the whole point of his restricted license was to keep him from carrying anywhere the public goes. That's the system Bruen struck down — one where a bureaucrat's discretion stood between you and a constitutional right.

    Question for the room: If you were carrying under a may-issue permit before Bruen — or you live somewhere that shifted to shall-issue after the ruling — did anything change about how you approach your carry setup or where you're comfortable carrying?


    Read the full article in The Handbook → | By The Boise Gun Club Team

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

    Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

    With your input, this post could be even better 💗

    Register Login
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups