.45 ACP Cartridge
-
Spent more than a few range days putting .45 ACP through its paces — and a fair amount of time at the reloading bench working with 230-grain FMJ. So when something catches my eye in a write-up on this old cartridge, it's worth talking through.
The Army's short-term fix was to pull old .45 Colt Single Action Army revolvers out of storage — some dating back to the Indian Wars campaigns — and reissue them. The heavier bullet performed noticeably better.
Think about that for a second — the Army's answer to a modern counterinsurgency problem was to dig out guns that were already antiques. That the heavier .45 Colt actually worked where the .38 Long Colt didn't is a data point that caliber partisans have been arguing about ever since, and honestly, it's not the worst argument to make.
A handgun cartridge intended for military use should have a caliber no smaller than .45, with soldiers drilled unremittingly in the accuracy of fire.
People quote the first half of that constantly and ignore the second half — the part about unremitting accuracy training. The Thompson-LaGarde board wasn't handing out a pass to guys who miss. That caveat matters whether you're on a match stage or carrying concealed.
The .45 ACP runs at roughly 40–60% of the chamber pressure that comparable modern cartridges generate. That low bolt thrust extends the service life of firearms chambered for it.
Anyone who's shot an old-school 1911 that's been through serious round counts knows this is real. Low-pressure cartridges are gentler on everything — frame, barrel, extractor. It's one reason suppressor hosts chambered in .45 ACP tend to hold up well over time, and why the platform has a reputation for longevity when it's properly maintained.
Since .45 ACP rounds are subsonic from the muzzle, there's no supersonic crack to deal with — only the muzzle report, which the suppressor addresses.
This is the thing 9mm guys don't always think about when they're bragging about suppressor performance — they're fighting a ballistic physics problem on top of the gas problem. With .45 ACP you're not. Every round is already subsonic without subsonics. The tradeoff on bore diameter and wet-firing requirements is real, but the baseline is hard to argue with.
What's your experience been with .45 ACP suppressors specifically — wet versus dry, and did the caliber choice actually matter for your hearing protection numbers compared to a 9mm setup?
Read the full article in The Handbook → | By The Boise Gun Club Team
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login