Skip to main content
Cruikshank: The Case That Broke Rights
NEWS
3 min read

Cruikshank: The Case That Broke Rights

United States v. Cruikshank (1876) emerged from a massacre and ended up gutting the Bill of Rights for over a century. The Second Amendment wasn't fully repaired until McDonald v. Chicago in 2010 — and the road there ran straight through a Heller footnote that served as a deliberate legal invitation.

Steve DuskettMay 10, 2026
Last edited
Article Info

Cruikshank: The Case That Broke Rights

Court DecisionHistorical
Cruikshank: The Case That Broke Rights
Scope
JurisdictionFederal
Impactnational
Key Entities
Issued Cruikshank (1876), Heller (2008), and McDonald (2010) rulingsSupreme Court of the United States
Defendant; mob ringleader in the 1873 Colfax massacreWilliam Cruikshank
Authored Heller majority; Footnote 23 signaled Cruikshank's Second Amendment legacy was vulnerableJustice Antonin Scalia
Attorney who won both Heller and McDonald v. ChicagoAlan Gura
Current SCOTUS justice; retirement rumors could affect Second Amendment court balanceJustice Samuel Alito
Legal Issues
  • Selective incorporation — whether the Bill of Rights applies against state governments via the 14th Amendment
  • Second Amendment individual right to keep and bear arms
What It Means
  • McDonald v. Chicago (2010) is settled law — states and localities cannot ban handguns or gut Second Amendment rights
  • The 134-year gap between Cruikshank and McDonald shows bad precedent dies slowly; court composition determines how long
  • Alito retirement speculation is worth monitoring — the 5-4 majorities behind Heller and McDonald were fragile
  • Alan Gura's wins in Heller and McDonald were the direct legal remedy for what Cruikshank broke in 1876
Timeline
April 13, 1873Colfax massacre — the origin event of the Cruikshank prosecution
January 1, 1876SCOTUS decides United States v. Cruikshank, stripping federal protection of Bill of Rights against states
June 26, 2008District of Columbia v. Heller decided; Footnote 23 invites Second Amendment incorporation challenge
June 28, 2010McDonald v. Chicago decided; Second Amendment incorporated against states, Cruikshank's Second Amendment legacy buried

Cruikshank: The Case That Broke Rights

A forgotten 1876 ruling gutted the Bill of Rights for over a century — and its damage to the Second Amendment wasn't undone until 2010

From The Boise Gun Club Handbook

A Supreme Court case most Americans can't name did more damage to gun rights than nearly any law ever passed.

Catch up quick: The backstory is brutal.

  • On April 13, 1873, a white mob in Colfax, Louisiana slaughtered dozens of Black Republicans gathered at the parish courthouse
  • Federal prosecutors charged ringleader William Cruikshank with conspiring to prevent citizens from assembling, bearing arms, and enjoying liberty
  • Cruikshank's defense argued simply: the federal government has no business here — gun rights belong to the states

The ruling: SCOTUS agreed with the murderers. In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Court declared that none of the liberties in the Bill of Rights — not the First Amendment, not the Second — applied against state governments or private individuals. Only the federal government was bound by them.

That logic effectively slammed the federal courthouse door in the faces of massacre survivors and handed states a blank check to gut constitutional rights however they pleased.

The big picture: This wasn't just a Reconstruction-era injustice. Cruikshank stayed on the books and kept shaping American law for over 130 years. The First Amendment wasn't incorporated against states until Gitlow v. New York in 1925. The Second Amendment didn't get there until McDonald v. Chicago in 2010.

The intrigue: Justice Antonin Scalia essentially left a legal breadcrumb pointing toward McDonald. In his 2008 Heller opinion — which struck down D.C.'s handgun ban — Scalia added a footnote noting that Cruikshank had also been wrong about the First Amendment, and that courts had already buried that part of the ruling.

"With respect to Cruikshank's continuing validity, we note that Cruikshank also said that the First Amendment did not apply against the States and did not engage in the sort of Fourteenth Amendment inquiry required by our later cases." — Justice Antonin Scalia, District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), Footnote 23

Alan Gura, the attorney who won both Heller and McDonald, later said he read that footnote as an outright invitation to bring the incorporation challenge. He accepted.

What gun owners should know: McDonald is settled law — the Second Amendment applies against state and local governments nationwide. But the 134-year gap between Cruikshank and McDonald is a reminder that constitutional rights don't enforce themselves. Courts have to be pushed. Cases have to be brought. And bad precedents, once set, have a long half-life.

What to watch: Justice Samuel Alito, 76, is reportedly considering retirement timing around the 2026 midterms, aware that Republican Senate control affects confirmation odds for any Trump nominee. The balance that produced Heller and McDonald could shift. SCOTUS composition still matters enormously for Second Amendment doctrine.

#
#
Join the discussion on Campfire
Was this article helpful?

Loading comments...