Skip to main content
Ohio Lets Owners Sue Rogue Cities
NEWS
2 min read

Ohio Lets Owners Sue Rogue Cities

The Ohio Senate passed SB 278 24-9, allowing gun owners to sue municipalities that pass local gun ordinances — already banned under state law — and collect punitive damages. Sponsor Sen. Terry Johnson says cities like Columbus have been ignoring the existing prohibition without consequence. The bill now moves to the Ohio House.

Steve DuskettApril 24, 2026
Last edited
Article Info

Ohio Lets Owners Sue Rogue Cities

LegislationDeveloping
Ohio Lets Owners Sue Rogue Cities
Scope
JurisdictionOhio
Impactstate
Key Entities
SB 278 sponsor, R-McDermottSen. Terry Johnson
Passed SB 278 by 24-9 voteOhio Senate
Republican Senate leader supporting the billSenate President Rob McColley
Endorsed Ramaswamy-McColley gubernatorial ticketBuckeye Firearms Association
Legal Issues
  • Second Amendment preemption of local ordinances
  • Ohio Revised Code Section 9.68 — state preemption of local gun laws
  • Home rule authority vs. state firearms preemption
  • Punitive damages standard for civil rights violations by political subdivisions
What It Means
  • Ohio gun owners can sue cities that pass unconstitutional local gun ordinances
  • Successful suits can yield punitive or exemplary damages — not just injunctive relief
  • Municipalities that ignore state preemption law now face direct financial liability
  • Bill reinforces Ohio's existing constitutional carry framework passed in 2022
Timeline
April 2026Ohio Senate passes SB 278 24-9
May 5, 2026Ohio primary elections; legislature returns to session after recess
Fall 2025SB 278 introduced by Sen. Johnson
Related Laws

Ohio Lets Owners Sue Rogue Cities

A new Ohio bill gives gun owners the right to sue municipalities that pass ordinances the state already banned — and collect punitive damages

From The Boise Gun Club Handbook

The Ohio Senate passed a bill last week letting private citizens sue municipalities that enact gun control ordinances in defiance of state law.

Driving the news: Senate Bill 278, sponsored by Sen. Terry Johnson (R-McDermott), cleared the full Senate 24-9 and heads to the Ohio House when the legislature returns from recess in May. The bill amends Section 9.68 of the Revised Code to authorize civil suits — including punitive and exemplary damages — against any political subdivision that passes or enforces gun restrictions.

Catch up quick:

  • Ohio already bans local governments from enacting gun ordinances under existing state law
  • Johnson co-authored Ohio's 2022 constitutional carry law
  • Despite those protections, Johnson says liberal municipalities — Columbus specifically — keep passing anti-gun ordinances anyway

The problem SB 278 is solving isn't that the law didn't exist. It's that the law had no teeth. Cities calculated that passing an unconstitutional ordinance cost them nothing. If a gun owner got cited and fought back, the city absorbed the legal skirmish and moved on. Johnson's bill changes that math: lose in court, and the subdivision pays punitive damages.

"Hopefully [this] will help localities like Columbus understand that they're going to have to pay a cost for doing this." — Sen. Terry Johnson

Between the lines: Johnson was blunt that some city officials know they're breaking state law and do it anyway. That's not a drafting oversight — it's a political calculation. SB 278 is designed to make that calculation expensive.

Yes, but: Senate President Rob McColley was careful to frame this as consistent with home rule, not an attack on it. "Home rule is still alive in the state of Ohio," McColley told reporters. The bill doesn't strip municipal authority — it just attaches financial consequences to unconstitutional use of it. Whether that distinction holds up under legal challenge remains to be seen.

What's next: The legislature is out until May, with primary elections on May 5. The House picks it up after recess. No companion bill or House opposition has been reported publicly yet.

#
#
Join the discussion on Campfire
Was this article helpful?

Loading comments...