Skip to main content
Virginia Gun Ban Hits Court
NEWS
2 min read

Virginia Gun Ban Hits Court

Gun Owners of America and allies face a Virginia court Friday in Crump v. Katz, challenging SB749 and SB727 — sweeping bans on semi-automatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines. The lawsuit argues both laws violate the Virginia Constitution, and exposes a logical flaw in the magazine ban so glaring the plaintiffs named it after Schrödinger's cat.

Steve DuskettJune 10, 2026
Article Info

Virginia Gun Ban Hits Court

Court DecisionDeveloping
Virginia Gun Ban Hits Court
Scope
JurisdictionVirginia
Impactstate
Key Entities
Lead plaintiff organizationGun Owners of America
Co-plaintiff organizationVirginia Citizens Defense League
Gun rights journalist and named plaintiffJohn Crump
Presiding court for Friday's hearingLancaster County Circuit Court
Legal Issues
  • Article I, Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution — right to keep and bear arms
  • Whether commonly owned semi-automatic firearms and standard-capacity magazines are protected under Virginia law
  • Vagueness challenge to SB749's magazine definition based on caliber-dependent legality
What It Means
  • Virginia gun owners face Class 1 misdemeanor charges and forfeiture for possessing or carrying banned firearms and magazines
  • SB749 bans sale, transfer, manufacture, and importation of many common semi-automatic firearms and magazines over 15 rounds
  • SB727 bans carrying those firearms in all public spaces with no exception for self-defense
  • The same physical magazine may be legal or illegal depending solely on its stated caliber use — creating enforcement ambiguity
Timeline
June 13, 2025First hearing in Crump v. Katz, Lancaster County Circuit Court
2025Virginia General Assembly passed SB749 and SB727
Related Laws

Virginia Gun Ban Hits Court

A Friday hearing in Lancaster County could determine whether Virginia's sweeping assault firearms and magazine bans survive their first legal challenge.

From The Boise Gun Club Handbook

A federal lawsuit targeting Virginia's new assault firearms and magazine bans gets its first day in court this Friday.

State of play: The case, Crump v. Katz, was filed by Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation, Virginia Citizens Defense League, and gun rights journalist John Crump. It challenges two laws passed this session:

  • SB749 bans the sale, transfer, manufacture, purchase, and importation of many common semi-automatic firearms and magazines over 15 rounds
  • SB727 bans carrying those same firearms in any public space — streets, sidewalks, parks — with no self-defense exception for law-abiding Virginians

The legal argument centers on Article I, Section 13 of the Virginia Constitution, which states flatly that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." The suit argues both laws violate that guarantee for the most commonly owned firearms and magazines in the country.

The intrigue: The magazine ban has an almost comical flaw the lawsuit exploits directly. The same physical magazine can be legal or illegal depending on what caliber the owner says it's intended for — what the complaint calls a Schrödinger's "large capacity ammunition feeding device." Legal with one caliber, prohibited with another. Same magazine. Same owner. Same day.

That's not careful legislating. That's what happens when politicians write laws about hardware they've never handled.

Threat level: Violations under these laws carry Class 1 misdemeanor charges and firearm forfeiture. Law-abiding gun owners who bought perfectly legal guns and magazines before this session could face criminal exposure for continuing to own, carry, or transfer them.

What to watch: The hearing is Friday in Lancaster County Circuit Court. This is the first significant test of whether Virginia's judiciary will apply any meaningful scrutiny to these bans or wave them through. GOA has a litigation fund running if you want to back the case financially.

The bottom line: Virginia just banned some of the most common firearms in America and attached criminal penalties to ownership. Friday's hearing won't end this fight, but it's the opening round — and how the court responds will signal how hard the next phase gets.

#
#
Join the discussion on Campfire
Was this article helpful?

Loading comments...