Skip to main content
Canada Blinks on Gun Confiscation
NEWS
3 min read

Canada Blinks on Gun Confiscation

Canada's Carney government has extended its gun ban amnesty for the fourth time, suspending criminal liability for owners of 2,500+ banned firearm types until at least 90 days after the Supreme Court rules on whether the 2020 ban was lawful. The Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights, backed by three provincial governments, argues Ottawa overstepped its authority with a cabinet-only decree. The voluntary buyback is still proceeding, but compliance numbers are well below initial projections.

Steve DuskettJuly 18, 2026
Last edited
Article Info

Canada Blinks on Gun Confiscation

Court DecisionDeveloping
Canada Blinks on Gun Confiscation
Scope
JurisdictionFederal
Impactinternational
Key Entities
Plaintiff challenging the 2020 ban at the Supreme Court of CanadaCanadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR)
Canadian Minister of Public Safety, announced the fourth amnesty extensionGary Anandasangaree
Agreed in March 2026 to hear the constitutional challenge to the banSupreme Court of Canada
Interveners supporting the CCFR's legal challengeGovernments of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario
Canadian Prime Minister whose government is defending the banMark Carney
Legal Issues
  • Whether federal cabinet has statutory authority to ban firearm classes by order-in-council without parliamentary legislation
  • Scope of executive authority under Canada's Firearms Act
What It Means
  • Canadian gun owners face no criminal liability for retaining banned firearms until at least 90 days after the Supreme Court rules — a timeline of roughly 1–1.5 years minimum
  • The Supreme Court could invalidate the entire ban if it finds cabinet lacked authority to impose it by decree without Parliament
  • Voluntary buyback is ongoing in most provinces now; owners who enrolled will receive compensation regardless of court outcome
  • Alberta and Saskatchewan have legally blocked collection efforts within their borders
Timeline
March 2026Supreme Court of Canada agreed to hear the CCFR's challenge to the 2020 firearms ban
June 2026Carney government announced fourth extension of criminal amnesty for banned firearm owners
October 2026Voluntary buyback compensation program expected to complete

Canada Blinks on Gun Confiscation

Ottawa extends its assault-style ban amnesty for the fourth time as Canada's Supreme Court prepares to rule on whether the 2020 ban was ever legal

From The Boise Gun Club Handbook

Canada's federal government has punted its gun confiscation deadline again — this time citing a pending Supreme Court ruling on whether the 2020 "assault-style" firearms ban was ever lawful to begin with.

State of play: The Carney government announced Tuesday it would extend criminal amnesty protections for owners of roughly 2,500 banned firearm types. This is the fourth extension since the ban took effect, and the new deadline sits at least 90 days after the Supreme Court issues its ruling — a timeline Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree pegged at "a year to a year and a half at the low end."

Catch up quick:

  • Canada's 2020 order-in-council banned roughly 2,500 firearm models by cabinet decree — no parliamentary vote
  • The Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights challenged the ban; lower courts upheld Ottawa, but the Supreme Court agreed in March to hear the case
  • Alberta and Saskatchewan have blocked collection efforts within their borders; Ontario, Alberta, and Saskatchewan governments back the legal challenge

The legal question: The CCFR's core argument is that federal cabinet overstepped its statutory authority — that banning firearms by order-in-council, without Parliament, exceeds what the law permits. Two lower courts sided with Ottawa. The Supreme Court taking the case doesn't mean it agrees with those rulings; it means the question is serious enough to settle nationally.

"We suspect the government realized that a defeat at the Supreme Court of Canada after collecting guns and or prosecuting those in non-compliance would be an untenable position for Mark Carney's Liberals." — Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights

By the numbers:

  • 67,000+ owners enrolled in the voluntary buyback
  • 12,000 guns destroyed after business submissions
  • 61,900 declared but not yet surrendered
  • 2,500+ firearm types covered by the ban

Those enrollment figures are well below what Ottawa projected when the program launched — which is part of why the compliance question matters so much heading into a Supreme Court ruling.

The intrigue: The government is running two tracks simultaneously and calling them unrelated. The buyback collection continues in most provinces right now, using off-duty RCMP and mobile units after virtually every major police service in the country declined to participate. But criminal liability for non-compliance is suspended indefinitely. Ottawa is essentially saying: turn yours in voluntarily, but we won't criminalize you if you don't — pending what the top court says.

What to watch: The Supreme Court's ruling will determine whether the entire ban stands or falls on a question of executive authority. If the court strikes it down, guns already surrendered are gone and owners received compensation — but future enforcement becomes moot. If the court upholds the ban, the 90-day clock starts and Ottawa will face the same non-compliance problem it's been avoiding for four years, now with a legal mandate behind it.

#
#
Join the discussion on Campfire
Was this article helpful?

Loading comments...