Article Info
Canada Blinks on Gun Confiscation

| Scope | |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Federal |
| Impact | international |
| Key Entities | |
| Plaintiff challenging the 2020 ban at the Supreme Court of Canada | Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights (CCFR) |
| Canadian Minister of Public Safety, announced the fourth amnesty extension | Gary Anandasangaree |
| Agreed in March 2026 to hear the constitutional challenge to the ban | Supreme Court of Canada |
| Interveners supporting the CCFR's legal challenge | Governments of Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Ontario |
| Canadian Prime Minister whose government is defending the ban | Mark Carney |
| Legal Issues | |
| |
| What It Means | |
| |
| Timeline | |
| March 2026 | Supreme Court of Canada agreed to hear the CCFR's challenge to the 2020 firearms ban |
| June 2026 | Carney government announced fourth extension of criminal amnesty for banned firearm owners |
| October 2026 | Voluntary buyback compensation program expected to complete |
Canada Blinks on Gun Confiscation
Ottawa extends its assault-style ban amnesty for the fourth time as Canada's Supreme Court prepares to rule on whether the 2020 ban was ever legal
From The Boise Gun Club Handbook
Canada's federal government has punted its gun confiscation deadline again — this time citing a pending Supreme Court ruling on whether the 2020 "assault-style" firearms ban was ever lawful to begin with.
State of play: The Carney government announced Tuesday it would extend criminal amnesty protections for owners of roughly 2,500 banned firearm types. This is the fourth extension since the ban took effect, and the new deadline sits at least 90 days after the Supreme Court issues its ruling — a timeline Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree pegged at "a year to a year and a half at the low end."
Catch up quick:
- Canada's 2020 order-in-council banned roughly 2,500 firearm models by cabinet decree — no parliamentary vote
- The Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights challenged the ban; lower courts upheld Ottawa, but the Supreme Court agreed in March to hear the case
- Alberta and Saskatchewan have blocked collection efforts within their borders; Ontario, Alberta, and Saskatchewan governments back the legal challenge
The legal question: The CCFR's core argument is that federal cabinet overstepped its statutory authority — that banning firearms by order-in-council, without Parliament, exceeds what the law permits. Two lower courts sided with Ottawa. The Supreme Court taking the case doesn't mean it agrees with those rulings; it means the question is serious enough to settle nationally.
"We suspect the government realized that a defeat at the Supreme Court of Canada after collecting guns and or prosecuting those in non-compliance would be an untenable position for Mark Carney's Liberals." — Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights
By the numbers:
- 67,000+ owners enrolled in the voluntary buyback
- 12,000 guns destroyed after business submissions
- 61,900 declared but not yet surrendered
- 2,500+ firearm types covered by the ban
Those enrollment figures are well below what Ottawa projected when the program launched — which is part of why the compliance question matters so much heading into a Supreme Court ruling.
The intrigue: The government is running two tracks simultaneously and calling them unrelated. The buyback collection continues in most provinces right now, using off-duty RCMP and mobile units after virtually every major police service in the country declined to participate. But criminal liability for non-compliance is suspended indefinitely. Ottawa is essentially saying: turn yours in voluntarily, but we won't criminalize you if you don't — pending what the top court says.
What to watch: The Supreme Court's ruling will determine whether the entire ban stands or falls on a question of executive authority. If the court strikes it down, guns already surrendered are gone and owners received compensation — but future enforcement becomes moot. If the court upholds the ban, the 90-day clock starts and Ottawa will face the same non-compliance problem it's been avoiding for four years, now with a legal mandate behind it.
- Phils Custom Handloads(Swartz Creek, MI)
- Gls Guns(Sumner, IA)
- J & L Gunsmithing(Chesapeake, VA)
- Oliver Firearms(Spartanburg, SC)
Loading comments...