Article Info
SAF Takes Gun Liability Fight to SCOTUS

| Scope | |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Federal |
| Impact | national |
| Key Entities | |
| Filed amicus brief urging SCOTUS to grant certiorari | Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) |
| Petitioner in the underlying case | National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) |
| New York Attorney General defending the state's public nuisance law | Letitia James |
| Co-signatory on SAF amicus brief | National Rifle Association |
| Upheld New York law, triggering SCOTUS petition | Second Circuit Court of Appeals |
| Legal Issues | |
| |
| What It Means | |
| |
| Timeline | |
| May 2025 | SAF files amicus brief with U.S. Supreme Court urging cert in NSSF v. James |
| Related Laws | |
SAF Takes Gun Liability Fight to SCOTUS
New York's public nuisance law could gut federal protections shielding gun makers from coordinated lawsuits
From The Boise Gun Club Handbook
The Second Amendment Foundation is asking the Supreme Court to take up a case that could determine whether states can bankrupt the firearms industry through litigation that Congress already tried to block.
Driving the news: SAF filed an amicus brief Monday urging SCOTUS to review National Shooting Sports Foundation, Inc. v. Letitia James, a challenge to a New York state law that critics say was engineered to sidestep the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA).
Catch up quick:
- Congress passed the PLCAA specifically to stop coordinated sue-them-into-oblivion campaigns against gun manufacturers for criminal misuse of their products.
- New York responded with a "public nuisance" statute that routes around PLCAA by framing liability under state public safety grounds.
- The Second Circuit upheld New York's law, which is what pushed this to SCOTUS's doorstep.
The legal question: Does a state's public nuisance framing actually circumvent federal immunity, or is this exactly the kind of end-run the PLCAA was written to stop? That's what SAF, the NRA, and the Independence Institute are asking nine justices to answer.
"Congress passed the PLCAA to stop coordinated litigation campaigns designed to bankrupt the firearms industry through meritless lawsuits." — Kostas Moros, SAF Director of Legal Research and Education
The bigger threat isn't just New York. If the Second Circuit ruling stands without SCOTUS review, it hands every state attorney general a blueprint. File public nuisance claims, pile on litigation costs, watch manufacturers settle or fold. California, Illinois, and Massachusetts aren't going to miss that memo.
Between the lines: SAF founder Alan Gottlieb framed this explicitly as a separation-of-powers issue — gun control through courts instead of legislatures, bypassing voters entirely. That framing matters for how SCOTUS might approach standing and the scope of PLCAA preemption.
What to watch: Whether SCOTUS grants certiorari. The Court isn't obligated to take the case, and cert denials leave the Second Circuit ruling intact. If they pass, expect New York's law to become a model statute circulating through blue-state legislatures within months.
- Phils Custom Handloads(Swartz Creek, MI)
- Gls Guns(Sumner, IA)
- J & L Gunsmithing(Chesapeake, VA)
- Oliver Firearms(Spartanburg, SC)
Loading comments...