Article Info
NFA Registration Fight Heats Up

| Scope | |
|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Federal |
| Impact | national |
| Key Entities | |
| Lead plaintiff, filed supplemental reply brief in Brown v. ATF | Second Amendment Foundation |
| Defendant; administers NFA registration program | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives |
| Co-plaintiff in Brown v. ATF | National Rifle Association |
| Co-plaintiff in Brown v. ATF | Firearms Policy Coalition |
| Co-plaintiff representing suppressor industry and owners | American Suppressor Association |
| Legal Issues | |
| |
| What It Means | |
| |
| Timeline | |
| 2025 | One Big Beautiful Bill signed, eliminating the $200 NFA transfer tax |
| 2025 | SAF files supplemental reply brief in Brown v. ATF challenging remaining NFA registration requirement |
| Related Laws | |
NFA Registration Fight Heats Up
The $200 tax is gone — SAF is now going after the registration requirement itself
From The Boise Gun Club Handbook
The Second Amendment Foundation is pushing to kill what's left of the NFA's grip on suppressors and short-barreled rifles — starting with the registry.
Driving the news: SAF filed a supplemental reply brief in Brown v. ATF, directly challenging the federal registration requirement for silencers and SBRs. The "One Big Beautiful Bill" already axed the $200 transfer tax. This case targets what survived.
State of play: SAF is running three separate legal challenges to the NFA's remaining framework. Brown is one of them. The court itself requested the supplemental briefing to address the proper Second Amendment analysis — which is notable. Courts don't ask for more argument when they've already made up their minds against you.
Catch up quick:
- The NFA has required federal registration of suppressors and SBRs since 1934
- Recent legislation eliminated the $200 transfer tax
- The registration requirement — and the government's ability to track owners — remains law
- SAF is joined by the NRA, Firearms Policy Coalition, and American Suppressor Association
By the numbers: Over five million suppressors are currently registered with the ATF, plus millions of SBRs. That's the population of owners SAF is arguing the government has been unconstitutionally tracking for nine decades.
"Registering your guns with the same government the Second Amendment is intended to protect you from runs contrary to the fundamental principles of the right to keep and bear arms. More than 90 years of constitutional injury is enough." — Alan Gottlieb, SAF Founder and Executive Vice President
The legal question: SAF's argument leans on Bruen's historical tradition test — if the Founders didn't require gun owners to register with the government, modern registration requirements have a constitutional problem. The government's counter-arguments, according to SAF Director of Legal Operations Bill Sack, have been systematically dismantled in the reply brief.
What Idaho owners should know: If this challenge succeeds, owning a suppressor or SBR would no longer require ATF registration, a Form 4, or the months-long wait that comes with it. You'd buy it like a rifle. That's the endgame here.
What to watch: Three active SAF challenges to the NFA are moving simultaneously. A favorable ruling in Brown doesn't end the fight, but it breaks the dam. Watch for the court's response to whether it accepts SAF's Second Amendment framing — that's the tell.
- Phils Custom Handloads(Swartz Creek, MI)
- Gls Guns(Sumner, IA)
- J & L Gunsmithing(Chesapeake, VA)
- Oliver Firearms(Spartanburg, SC)
Loading comments...